Plants, Not Clients, Should Climb the Walls

Event: Green Walls (Helfand Spotlight Series)
Location: Center for Architecture, 03.24.09
Speakers: Clare Miflin — Associate Principal, Kiss + Cathcart; Marni Horwitz — Principal, Alive Structures; Denise Hoffman-Brandt, ASLA — Associate Professor, City College School of Architecture and Urban Design
Moderator: Susannah Drake, ASLA, Assoc. AIA — dlandstudio, 2009 President, New York Chapter, ASLA
Organizers: AIANY in partnership with the New York Chapter, American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA)
Sponsors: Alive Structures; Landscape Forms, Inc.; New York City Green Roof and Landscape; Lieb’s Greenhouses Inc.

(L-R): Susannah Drake, ASLA, Assoc. AIA; Denise Hoffman-Brandt, ASLA; Marni Horwitz; Clare Miflin.

Bill Millard

Green roofs have become a highly visible instrument and symbol of commitment to sustainable design. The same biophilic impulse applied to interior and exterior walls can improve a wide range of environments, but as the green-wall specialists who spoke at the opening of “Work in Progress: Green Walls” at the Center for Architecture emphasized, the practical challenges of working with vegetation are complex. Enthusiasm and good intentions alone won’t create a healthy botanical structure that improves air quality, water management, thermal control, acoustics, and aesthetics; it takes specific expertise and sound judgment about the right species and support systems for a particular space.

Clare Miflin presented a series of success stories including the Solar One environmental learning center at Stuyvesant Cove Park, the vine-covered Riverhouse at the Bronx River Greenway, and the Vertically Integrated Greenhouse, a hydroponic food-production facility proposed as a New York Sun Works demonstration project at the Science Barge on the Hudson. The Bronx project, she recalled, involved the opposite of architects’ customary thinking about hydrology: instead of striving to minimize water requirements, she found in working with the Gaia Institute’s Paul Mankiewicz that a “maximalist” approach to water use was preferable, creating a space with credible resemblance to a temperate rain forest.

Marni Horwitz, a certified green-roof and green-wall installer, recognizes risks as well as benefits. Cautioning that some businesses look to this form of construction for greenwashing purposes, she emphasized that green walls are a young industry with considerable potential to backfire when firms start “experimenting on clients.” One restaurant installed a green wall without proper irrigation; after a striking appearance for the first week or so, the soil dried, the plants died, and diners found bits of soil dropping into their meals. Modular soil-based systems can be dramatically beautiful, she said, but also labor-intensive and costly (up to $150 per square foot); irrigation requires constant attention; simple, seasonal native-species vines such as Virginia Creepers are often the most reliable choices.

The evening’s most visionary discussion, offered by Denise Hoffman-Brandt, ASLA, concerned integrating green walls into broader systemic thinking. Her City-Sink project addresses the function of plants as carbon-sequestering agents, not just ornamentation, in urban space. Retrofitting roadside sound-barrier walls along the Staten Island Expressway and the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway to suspend plants on geotextile fabrics held by rebar cages, creating microclimates and areas sheltered from sun scorch, Brandt’s system converts a component of an otherwise harsh and drab highway environment into an ecological asset.

As NY-ASLA President Susannah Drake, ASLA, Assoc. AIA, pointed out, plants as a design element have a long history, from the Hanging Gardens of Babylon to the ivy of college campuses. Arguments in favor of green walls, as Miflin mentioned during the panel segment, involve measurable cost-benefit ratios as well as intangibles: they reduce asthma and air-conditioning use while providing “increased worker productivity and happiness.” Hoffman-Brandt stressed the scalability of the various benefits relative to initial costs and noted that the more manageable vines, while useful in smaller urban settings, do not maximize biomass for long-term carbon storage as bulkier species do. More complex local ecosystems, including urban fauna — birds, beneficial insects, occasional snakes — are “hard to sell to community boards,” Hoffman-Brandt acknowledged, perhaps touching on a core conflict between philosophies of design: the uncontrollable messiness of nature vs. the urge for predictability and reductionism that shapes many modern spaces. “The thing to take away from these green walls,” she added, “is the kind of language they’re setting up for microclimate and microconditions and diversity” — natural qualities that users and observers of these spaces may need to adjust to.

“No system is going to be 100% perfect, except in theory,” commented Horwitz. The pragmatism and attention to detail in this discussion suggests that the local green-design community has moved well beyond the stage of initial enthusiasm that sees natural elements as a panacea, instead taking a realistic nuts-and-bolts approach to the specifics of leaves and roots.

In a Shifting Economy, Architects Shift Gears

Event: Firm Development in Uncertain Times — A discussion with Jack Reigle
Location: Center for Architecture, 03.25.09
Speakers: Jack Reigle — President, SPARKS, The Center for Strategic Planning
Organizers: Professor Frank Mruk, AIA, New York Institute of Technology for the Center for Architecture and the Association for Strategic Planning
Sponsor: AIANY New Practices Committee

The past several months have been filled with an uneasy feeling of “now what?” remarked design-business consultant Jack Reigle. Faced with the recession, architects are collectively holding their breath, waiting to see what’s in store for them, their firms, and the industry.

Don’t panic and blindly seek whatever projects can be found, warned Reigle, author of the book Silver Bullets — Strategic Intelligence for Better Design Firm Management (Bascom Hill Publishing Group, 2008). “You want to be better, not busier,” he explained. A firm should carefully assess its individual identity and mission, and pursue the specific types of clients and projects that will help to fulfill its “higher purpose.” Don’t let short-term practical matters drain your time at the expense of far-sighted strategic thinking, he cautioned, for that leads to inefficiency. Focusing on long-term goals helps a firm gain greater success and a more defined identity, which ultimately means attracting business instead of having to spend time chasing it.

Archetypes can help a firm clarify its mission, he added. Is your firm an “Einstein” — a producer of visionary ideas? Or a “niche expert” that clients turn to for advancing a certain specialized type of project? Or a “market partner,” which collaborates with the client to pursue immersion in a certain market? Some other archetypes include “community leader,” “orchestrator,” and “builder.” In general, it’s best for a firm to limit itself to one or two archetypes, to keep well focused, Reigle said. When one audience member from a large company questioned the advisability of such a tight focus, Reigle suggested that big companies might draw from a greater number of archetypes, but each department should keep its own identity well defined.

He also emphasized the importance of “client and market empathy.” “You’ve got to develop expertise beyond your professional skills: expertise that is based on knowledge and familiarity, let’s say, with markets,” he said. “The more you do that, as opposed to just jumping from market to market, the more you’ll be able to contribute.” That kind of market savvy helps architects empathize with the specific challenges the client faces, and as a result, architects can offer services beyond architecture itself, such as valuable research and information, or even marketing.

The economic downturn might also necessitate different, more flexible ways of working, Reigle said. Some architects might end up working as freelancers in medium-to-large firms instead of full-time staff. Also, virtual firms might gain traction, as architects band together on more of an ad-hoc basis in response to these fluid, uncertain times.

Questions Answered for Emerging Professionals

Event: Mentor Match: Burning Questions
Location: Trespa Design Centre, 03.24.09
Mentors: Marc Clemenceau Bailly, AIA — Gage/Clemenceau Architects; Sunil Bald — Studio SUMO; Brandon Cook — Helpern Architects; Jeremy Edmunds, Assoc. AIA, LEED AP; Nancy Goshow, AIA — Goshow Architects; Kathy Kleiver — H3 Hardy Collaboration Architecture; Syed Mahmood — AEG; Kristen Richards — ArchNewsNow, OCULUS; Jessica Sheridan, Assoc. AIA, LEED AP — Helpern Architects
Organizer: AIANY Emerging New York Architects Committee (ENYA)
Sponsor: Trespa

During times of intense change, young architects often have career questions not easily answered by those in their inner circle. The Mentor Match: Burning Questions event was developed to provide insight on these questions from both a peer network and a team of established professionals. Small groups of five to 10 interns and architects met with experienced professionals for an hour-long discussion on topics ranging from pursuing alternate design-related careers to returning to graduate school. Those interested in portfolio and resume review discussed their work; a dozen young professionals met to discuss first steps involved in starting a firm.

In this turbulent economy, mentoring has assumed an increased level of importance. Young architects are forced to either confront career change as a result of layoffs or firm restructuring. Senior practitioners have a vested interest in keeping young architects engaged in the profession to prevent the generational attrition of previous recessions, which resulted in long-term gaps in the workforce.

Through the Emerging NY Architects Committee, AIANY offers two mentoring events targeted towards young architects each year. These events are intended to complement the Chapter’s Mentor Match initiative, a structured program that pairs interns and architects in more traditional mentoring relationship. Those interested in participating in the program should e-mail mentoring@aiany.org for more information.

Arup Simplifies Complex Towers

Event: Thinking Outside The Box — Tapered, Tilted, Twisted Towers
Location: Center for Architecture, 03.19.09
Speakers: David Scott, PE, Hon. AIA — Chairman, Council of Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat & Principal, Arup
Organizers: Center for Architecture
Sponsors: Underwriters: The Center for Architecture Foundation; National Endowment for the Arts; Patron: Con Edison; Lead Sponsors: Arup; Buro Happold; Material ConneXion; Thornton Tomasetti; Supporters: The American Council of Engineering Companies; Josef Gartner USA/Permasteelisa Group; Weidlinger Associates; Friend: Grimshaw.

Strata Tower in Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Asymptote: Hani Rashid + Lise Anne Couture

“In terms of towers, the world has changed,” stated David Scott, PE, Hon. AIA, a principal at Arup. “Architects and engineers can now design almost anything –[but] should we?” Scott presented the firm’s latest engineering feats during a discussion of non-traditional towers that continue to dot global skylines.

Utilizing tools ranging from folded paper study models to parametric modeling, Arup is responsible for engineering complex structures such as Asymptote’s Strata Tower in Abu Dhabi and Moshe Safdie and Associates’ Marina Bay Sands in Singapore. Scott discussed these projects among others designed by HOK, KPF, Studio Daniel Libeskind, and Pelli Clarke Pelli to explain how conventional tower standards are modified to create untraditional forms. The complexities of Arup’s towers often mask a fairly simple structural model. Revealing the mystery behind daunting engineering, Scott explained that it is due to repetitive structural systems and central cores, which also can be found in the simplest towers. It is this suspicious truth that Scott communicates to clients to alleviate their budget-conscious fears.

A contemporary trend — tapered, tilted, twisted towers — and the structural gymnastics employed to build them, are accomplished with sparse precedent. With each commission Arup builds upon previous exercises to inform the development of the next iconic tower.

Change Marks History of Preservation

Event: What Is Preservation and What Is the Landmarks Commission
Location: Center for Architecture, 03.30.09
Speakers: Mark Silberman — General Counsel, NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC); Anthony C. Wood — Chair, New York Preservation Archive Project; Frances Halsband, FAIA — Partner, Kliment Halsband Architects & Former LPC Commissioner
Moderator: Sherida Paulsen, FAIA — Partner, PKSB Architects, 2009 AIANY President, & Former LPC Chair
Organizers: AIANY Historic Buildings Committee

The New York Botanical Garden library, Fountain of Life, and Tulip Tree Allée, designed by Robert W. Gibson, were recently awarded NYC landmark status.

Courtesy NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission

The definition and history of landmarks and their designations in NYC is often unclear as it is ever evolving. In a recent panel discussion, the general counsel and several former members of the NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) spoke about its history and philosophy, highlighting changing ideas about preservation.

Anthony Wood, chair of the New York Preservation Archive Project, presented a capsule history of the Landmarks law. As the author of Preserving New York (Routledge, 2007), he debunked the myth that the fight to save Pennsylvania Station gave birth to the preservation movement, claiming the myth “robs us of 50 years of New York City history.” Wood emphasized the role of Albert Bard, an early advocate of preservation, who argued as early as 1913 that the city ought to make regulations based on aesthetics. It took decades of protests and legal action, however, before NY passed the Landmarks Preservation Law, which established the LPC. “The law was radical, but it was more radical in its concept than in application,” Wood said, citing the relative conservatism and gradualism with which the Commission has exercised its authority.

With this history as context, Frances Halsband, FAIA, a former LPC commissioner, examined the definition of preservation — a concept that, despite its apparent simplicity, can be difficult to apply in practice. Because individuals and communities may differ on what is worth preserving, Halsband cautioned that preservation is “an art and not a science.” It is an evolving process that reflects changing attitudes and values in the community. Unlike restoration, “preservation is primarily concerned with change,” Halsband said. “We are now preserving buildings that were last generation’s ‘threats,'” to historic areas.

Acts of preservation have as much to say about the present as the past, according to Halsband. “The best we can do is to be true to our own time.”

School Design Trends: Bringing Outside In

Event: Architectural Record‘s “Schools of the 21st Century”
Location: Center for Architecture, 03.24.09
Speakers: Pamela Loeffelman, FAIA — Principal, Perkins Eastman; Jan Keane, FAIA, LEED AP — Partner, Mitchell/Giurgola Architects; Steven Goldberg, FAIA — Partner, Mitchell/Giurgola Architects; James LaPosta, AIA — Partner & Chief Architectural Officer, JCJ Architecture; Gilbert Sanchez, AIA — Principal, Studio B Architects
Introduction: Charles Linn, FAIA — Senior Editor, Architectural Record
Organizers: AIANY Committee on Architecture for Education

Regional Center for the Arts by JCJ Architecture (left); Concordia International School Shanghai by Perkins Eastman (right).

Robert Benson Photography (left); Tim Griffith (right)

For the third year in a row, Architectural Record published its supplemental issue “Schools of the 21st Century,” focusing on school design trends and featuring schools that embody best practice design principles. The four case studies discussed included a middle school overlooking a picturesque mountain range, an American elementary and middle school in Germany embracing sustainable design, a performing arts high school in suburban Connecticut, and an international school in rapidly-expanding Shanghai. In his introduction, Charles Linn, FAIA, senior editor at Architectural Record, discussed how these forward-thinking schools provide relevant lessons in a time when school enrollment is climbing while spending is dropping.

While different in setting and design, the schools all promote sustainability and emphasize the importance of connectivity between indoor and outdoor spaces. At Concordia International School Shanghai, designed by Perkins Eastman, the city views from the rooftop studio are intended to inspire students, while the abundance of glass gives the impression of being outdoors throughout. Windows at Aspen Middle School, a LEED Gold-certified school with an Outdoor Education Program designed by Studio B Architects, look out to Buttermilk Mountain. A balcony off the cafeteria allows students to congregate outdoors to enjoy the views, as well. Large windows at the Regional Center for the Arts by JCJ Architecture in Trumbull, CT, offer students a sense of their surroundings while flooding the interior with natural daylight and reducing energy usage. The building was also sited to preserve much of the surrounding green space and woodlands. Operable clerestory windows at Mitchell/Giurgola Architects’ Elementary and Middle School in Bavaria provide natural ventilation and daylight, while terraces support informal outdoor gathering spaces.

Through environmentally responsible design, multi-functioning spaces, design that turns site constraints into assets, and the importance of outdoor connectivity, these buildings draw students into wanting to be at school. According to Pamela Loeffleman, FAIA, principal at Perkings Eastman, they are student-centric and accommodate students’ needs daily; they “interact with the students” leading to better educational environments.

Emerging Voices Take Inspiration From Shoes and Views

Event: Emerging Voices Lecture Series
Location: Urban Center, 03.26.09
Speakers: Andrew Berman, AIA — Principal, Andrew Berman Architect; Stella Betts, David Leven — Partners, LevenBetts
Organizer: The Architectural League of New York
Sponsors: New York State Council on the Arts; NYC Department of Cultural Affairs

Catskills House by LevenBetts (left); Center for Architecture by Andrew Berman Architect.

Michael Moran (left); Peter Aaron/Esto (right)

David Leven and Stella Betts are like a pair of shoes. Not because they cover a lot of ground (though they certainly did in their rapid-fire presentation), but because they work best as a duo. Opening their lecture with a slide of a set of sneakers, Leven said, “We’re a pair, we work in a pair, we think as a pair, and we’re interested in the ideas of similarities and differences that pairings bring up,” and then he and Betts presented a series of several projects grouped (naturally) in sets of two.

The vertical layers or horizontal patterns of landscapes inspired one pair of designs. A Catskills hillside house represents a layered topography, with an upper volume that seems to be slipping off the lower one. Echoing the surface patterns of farmland, a Columbia County house and garage consists of three volumes arranged in formations reminiscent of crop lines.

A couple of local projects explored the pairing of illumination and infrastructure. The Mixed Greens gallery features a luminous ceiling that resembles a “glowing lightbox,” Betts said. It contains mechanical and sprinkler systems, along with lights, and its gently zigzagging form reflects the configuration of the existing beams and columns, she added. Similarly, the EMR printing plant features a brightly lit stairwell or “vertical slot” that’s a locus for both infrastructure and illumination, Leven said.

Emerging Voices lectures typically consist of pairs of firms, which naturally leads to comparisons of their own. Like the partners of LevenBetts, Andrew Berman, AIA, is a local architect with a knack for weaving old materials into new interventions, remarked juror Joel Sanders, AIA, of Joel Sanders Architect, adding that they also share “a similar clean, spare design sensibility.” Berman’s sensibility emerged when he founded his firm during a recession in the mid-1990s, a time when “it seemed very natural to me to work with a kind of an economy and a modesty,” Berman explained. In many of his firm’s projects, the design is “a catalyst to reinvigorate and redefine the old [space], which has lost its relevancy or utility,” he added.

For a Californian client who craved a sensation of unlimited space, the firm transformed a tar roof on Grant Street into sprawling gardens and a penthouse, with a loft below. Windows frame views of Midtown, the Financial District, and the Police Building dome, and a lightwell brings natural light to a greenhouse and other spaces on the lower level.

The firm’s competition-winning design for the Center for Architecture transformed subterranean spaces that were once dark, dirty, and damp into light-filled places for exhibitions and events. The transformation necessitated a “violent excavation,” cutting away portions of the building’s concrete slabs on the street level and mezzanine to allow sunlight and sightlines to easily penetrate from the front window down two floors to the lecture hall. In the future, keep an eye out for the Andrew Berman Architect–designed entry kiosk at P.S.1, which will help that familiar local institution enhance its street presence too.

Governor Patterson at ABNY

Rick Bell, FAIA, with Governor Patterson.

Marissa Shorenstein

On Thursday, 04.02.09, New York State Governor David A. Patterson came to a breakfast meeting of the Association for a Better New York to discuss his efforts to close the largest budget gap in state history and stabilize New York’s long-term finances. Governor Paterson started his remarks by noting that a large number of the projects in the Federal Stimulus Package are located in NYC. The funding coming with these projects may camouflage the fact that the state’s budget, and the city’s budget as well, have been overwhelmed by what Governor Paterson called “the tsunami of revenue downturn.” He spoke of the compromises that had to be made by all parties in Albany and called for ongoing fiscal restraint, noting that the state’s budget “has more cuts and more recurring cuts than would have occurred if I jumped up and down and called the Legislators names.”

His budgetary outline was presented succinctly: “This is where we are now in the Empire State,” he said. “We are making decisions that are unpopular, and no one knows that better than me — the solace is that these decisions are necessary.” In an even tone he continued: “This budget is about broad sweeping reforms and change; it is the road to economic recovery.” Tonal change crept in with rhetorical challenge: “To those who are criticizing it, I say you do not understand the dire circumstances of this economy, and you do not understand the need for shared sacrifice. I am the Governor of this state and I do.”

The remarks spoke to specific numbers, including the $6 billion expected from the Stimulus Package and the $4.7 billion anticipated from the personal income tax, which Gov. Patterson had previously opposed. He suggested that there was a great need to eliminate waste and redundancy in state agencies by concentrating government operations, and he cited health care and prison reforms as areas currently receiving critical attention. The Rockefeller-era drug laws, in particular, were cited as causing expensive and unnecessary mandatory incarceration for first-time offenders who, he said, need treatment more than prison.

In addressing deficits, which he said were occurring in 43 of the 50 states, and totaling almost $190 billion, Gov. Patterson said that “we shouldn’t be myopic — this problem is occurring in other states. We’ve been an equal opportunity offender in this budget process.” He concluded by saying that the proposed MTA transit fare increases are “a total encumbrance” that should not proceed.

Challenged about keeping the “Governor” in “Governors Island” he spoke of ongoing negotiations with the city, promising that “there was something being worked out” that would help fund the Governors Island Preservation & Education Corporation and its programs providing public access. Revenue tsunami or no, Governors Island needs to be kept afloat.

NYC Transportation Funding Doesn’t Add Up

Last week, Mayor Bloomberg announced the list of federal stimulus transportation projects for the five boroughs. $261 million from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act will fund city projects, according to the Office of the Mayor. What is so disappointing to me is that, while the list incorporates much needed road and bridge improvements, as well as increased pedestrian accessibility, hardly any of the projects include mass transportation development.

For pedestrians, retail space will be added to St. George Ferry Terminal; a greenway at Hunts Point will be developed; Long Island City Queens Plaza will be converted into a major boulevard with new sidewalks and landscaping; West 125th Street in Manhattan will be reconstructed; and crumbling portions of the Coney Island and Rockaway Boardwalks will be rebuilt. For cars, ramps will be improved at the St. George Ferry Terminal and the Brooklyn Bridge; the Brooklyn Navy Yard’s roadways and water and sewer systems will be upgraded; and numerous bridges will be rehabilitated. The full list of projects is available online.

As far as mass transit is concerned, the only funding I see is for access to the number 6 train entrance at Hugh Grant Circle in Parkchester, and part of the Brooklyn Navy Yard improvement includes better access to the A/C/F trains. With major subway fare increases looming in June, I wonder how come more funding was not filtered into the MTA? Nationally, it is estimated that $27.5 billion will be allocated for the Surface Transportation Program, $8.4 billion will be designated for public transportation, and $9.3 billion will be for intercity and high-speed rail (See “Mass Transit and the Stimulus,” by Katherine Bagley, Columbia Journalism Review, 03.03.09). With these figures, mass transit consists of about $10 billion less in funding than roads and bridges, if the latter two estimates are combined, or 39% of the total transportation funding. While I think the percentages should be flipped nationwide, NYC should at least follow suit and divvy out funding similarly.

In this issue:
· Jersey City Bridges City and Marina
· Design Dresses Clothing Store
· A New Tree Grows in Brooklyn
· Reform Temple Restructures
· Prism Links to the Past at AAAL
· This Hotel Breaks the Archetype
· Color Floods Hell’s Kitchen


Jersey City Bridges City and Marina

Jersey City’s new waterfront master plan.

Starr Whitehouse Landscape Architects + nARCHITECTS

The Jersey City Waterfront Parks Conservancy recently unveiled a new master plan called Connect the Parks that re-imagines parcels of parkland in disrepair surrounding the Little Morris Canal Basin. The plan, designed by Starr Whitehouse Landscape Architects and Planners in collaboration with nARCHITECTS, ensures the protection of waterfront parkland and Manhattan views via passive lawns, kids’ play elements, interaction with water and nature combined with natural erosion protection, and promotion of aquatic life. An “Infinity Bridge” that connects two major parcels of parkland will result in a continuous walkway from the city to the marina. Two pavilions will provide gathering areas that can be used for concerts, puppet shows, and more.


Design Dresses Clothing Store

Derek Lam store.

SANAA

Women’s ready-to-wear and accessories designer Derek Lam’s first freestanding store has opened in Soho’s Cast-Iron Historic District. Designed by SANAA, the 2,800-square-foot boutique is on the ground floor of an 1876 warehouse building. The firm designed transparent organic forms crafted of clear acrylic to create distinct rooms within the store, each one housing a different collection. Custom-fitted wood and aluminum furniture, a one-pour concrete floor, and original brick walls painted white are intended to heighten the exhibition-like feel of the store.


A New Tree Grows in Brooklyn

Castle Braid Building.

Durukan Design

It’s not the same Castle Braid Building (a.k.a. 114 Troutman) as it was in Betty Smith’s novel, A Tree Grows in Brooklyn, set in pre-World War I Brooklyn. Durukan Design is transforming the 160,000-square-foot factory building for developer Mayer Schwartz into a rental apartment building with 146 one- to three-bedroom units. Concrete floors are printed with patterns, staircases take unexpected forms, and walls are built specifically so artists can use them as canvases. Glass encloses a 5,500-square-foot courtyard, designed by Future Green Studio, and is composed of green walls, garden enclaves, a graffiti art wall, a double-sided fireplace, wood furniture made from tree trunks, and found corrugated steel. Amenities are intended to create community, including a doorman, common area, gym, movie screening room, laundry center, library, and a game room. The developer is considering adding a food co-op/café for the project as well.


Reform Temple Restructures

Temple B’nai Chaim.

PKSB Architects

PKSB Architects got the green light for the construction of a new addition to Temple B’nai Chaim in Fairfield County, CT. The expansion will provide a sanctuary and reception hall and catering kitchen in a pre-engineered steel building. The existing temple will be converted to classroom, library, and administrative spaces. A glass and stone circulation spine will link the old and the new providing a unifying façade, appropriately scaled to the woodland setting.


Prism Links to the Past at AAAL

Glass link from terrace. The former American Numismatic Society is on the left; the Academy is on the right; Trinity Cemetery is beyond.

American Academy of Arts and Letters

The American Academy of Arts and Letters (AAAL) has completed construction of Glass Link, designed by architect James Vincent Czaika, AIA, and consulting architects Henry Cobb, FAIA, and Michael Flynn, FAIA, of Pei Cobb Freed & Partners. Connecting exhibition galleries in the administration building to those in the former headquarters of the American Numismatic Society, the new link is a rectangular prism, 12 square feet wide and 16 feet high with iron-laminated glass walls, roof, and floor. The roof panels are two panes of glass with a 50% white dotted frit pattern. The panels are supported by three structural glass beams, which bear directly on the existing walls. The floor consists of 16 translucent glass panels that allow uniform lighting below.


This Hotel Breaks the Archetype

Helix Hotel.

Leeser Architecture

Leeser Architecture has won an invited competition to design a five-star luxury hotel in Abu Dhabi. Known as the Helix Hotel, due to its staggered floor plates, the building rests in the bay, partially floating in the water and adjacent to the Zaha Hadid-designed Sheik Zayed Bridge now under construction. Guest rooms and suites are arranged around a helical floor that constantly shifts in width and pitch as it rises to the top floor. As the helix winds upward, programmatic elements change from lounges and restaurants on the bay, to meeting rooms and conference facilities, to lounges and cafés, a luxury indoor-outdoor health spa, and a rooftop deck with a glass-bottom swimming pool.

The firm is working with Atelier Ten on sustainable features to maximize use of local natural resources such as the installation of GROW cladding made from 100% recyclable polyethylene that will collect energy from both the sun and the wind. An interior waterfall in the atrium will help to maintain comfortable temperature and humidity levels, and a retractable glass wall will open up to ocean air. The 208-room/suite hotel will be the centerpiece of a comprehensive new development that will contain offices buildings, condominiums, and retail along the water.


Color Floods Hell’s Kitchen

Xie-Xie.

TVD

Therese Virserius Design recently unveiled the design for a fast-food gourmet restaurant concept called Xie-Xie, which means “thank you” in Mandarin. The 400-square-foot Asian sandwich shop located in Hell’s Kitchen has a façade with horizontal ribbed panels highlighting the Xie-Xie signage. The logo is imprinted on the glass in a gradient pattern. Inside, a violet and white wall is comprised of alternating colored stripes extending up the wall and cantilever across the ceiling. The wall directly across from the counter features Xie-Xie fortune cookies cast in hues of chartreuse, violet, raspberry, and orange in high gloss porcelain.